Concept papers synthetizing the project results on (1) the interplay and tensions between justice claims; (2) mechanisms that impede justice; and (3) fault lines of justice

The papers will reflect on the relation between the ideal-typical heuristic frameworks identified in the course of the theoretical reflection with the empirical results of WP3-6. Similarities and commonalities but also inconsistencies and contradictions in people’s attitudes to justice and experience of (in)justice, on the one hand, and the compatibility of the ‘lived’ and ‘the ideal’, on the other will be discussed with respect to (1) the interplay and tensions between justice claims; (2) mechanisms that impede justice; and (3) fault lines of justice.